Wednesday, March 3, 2010

Are they trying to confuse us? They've succeeded

After years of recommending that all men get regular PSA tests and digital rectal exams, the American Cancer Society is revising its guidelines.

Now it's saying that men should discuss the benefits and risks of prostate cancer screening with their doctors.

It sounds like one of those risks of screening for prostate cancer is a positive test. That would then require some type of action, like surgery or radiation therapy.

The problem is that both of these solutions carry lots of side effects, but doctors can't be sure whether it's a fast or slow-growing tumor. If it's a slow growing tumor, then the cure might be worse than the disease.

The ACS now recommends:

"...that men with no symptoms of prostate cancer who are in relatively good health and can expect to live at least 10 more years have the opportunity to make an informed decision with their doctor about screening after learning about the uncertainties, risks, and potential benefits associated with prostate cancer screening. These talks should start at age 50. Men with no symptoms who are not expected to live more than 10 years (because of age or poor health) should not be offered prostate cancer screening. For them, the risks likely outweigh the benefits, researchers have concluded.

"As in earlier guidelines, ACS recommends men at high risk – African-American men and men who have a father, brother, or son diagnosed with prostate cancer before age 65 – begin those conversations earlier, at age 45. Men at higher risk – those with multiple family members affected by the disease before age 65 – should start even earlier, at age 40."


I'm almost glad that I'm past this phase. It makes me uneasy when my doctor doesn't really have a good answer.

10 comments:

志義 said...

Drive carefully. It is not only cars that can be recalled by their Maker.............................................

Ken said...

I'm 65 and continue to insist on getting a PSA even though my Dr. seems to discourage me from having them done. I know there are a lot of false positives but I would rather deal with that than find out too late that I have an aggresive prostrate cancer.

Samual said...

Nice post.The pollution in environment has given rise to several disease a. among them most common disease is cancer. India’s medical facilities are world level and patients across the world come here for medical treatment because the hospitals of India provide good facilities at lower cost than USA, UK and Australia.

Cancer hospitals India

ranjini said...

Great thoughts you got there, believe I may possibly try just some of it throughout my daily life.




Cancer Treatments Hospitals

Victoryperfect said...

Great thoughts you got there, believe I may possibly try just some of it throughout my daily life.

Cancer Treatments Hospitals

Ricky jordan said...

Its really a nice blog.Thanks for the useful information.Such a inspirable and good blog . I am able to get new knowledge while reading this . Keep sharing this type of informative blogs.
horoscope2012

john smith said...

I am agree with your Blog.Thanks for the useful information.I have been reading a lot of stuff about it. but the way in it is presented is nice.Here is the information about
television production companies.

Allen soly said...

Hi, Its really good blog to let know about what is going on in our surrounding and let other people know about it. such a great information.
Online Jewellery Shops

sarabrook11 said...

Very true.Such a nice concept. Your information is true up to great most of the extent. Thanks for sharing.Thanks for the useful information.Such a inspirable and good post . I am able to get new knowledge while reading this . Keep sharing this type of informative posts.

website agency

Randy Lyons said...

2+ year Prostate cancer survivor, and my question: what motivates the ACS to flip their thinking and advice?! Men, every year!! past the age of 50 or prior to if your family has a history of Prostate cancer. I was 48, triatlon shape and went in for a foot injury. Very skilled physician and later urologist detected, by examination, saved my life! Both doctors felt something unusual, 7 of 12 samples during biopsy were cancerous.Its not the screening process but, the experrience, skill and, dare I say, the ethics of the urologist, that bring into question options and procedures. I had the best!!